Over the last half-century, there has been immense development of digital learning and training solutions. This solution has been developed for individuals of all ages and stages in life.
Hybrid learning is one such concept that is now rapidly becoming a popular concept for both learning and teaching. It has now paved the way for educators to educate both in-person and remote learners simultaneously. And, it’ll be in demand even after the pandemic is over.
At many levels, the hybrid learning concept is satisfyingly meeting the primary school education system’s expectations. A high level of flexibility is allowing students to choose their preferred learning style.
What is hybrid learning?
Hybrid learning integrates face-to-face and online instruction into a single, seamless learning experience. Students in primary schools who take school admission in Noida attend around half of the class sessions on campus, while the other half work online. Although this may appear to be a pretty simple formula, it takes a lot of forethought to guarantee that a hybrid works well. It allows the two formats to benefit from each other’s strengths.
A hybrid course design is a sensitive process that involves involvement from several professionals to realize its full potential.
For instance, specific skills are best acquired in a lab environment where students gain hands-on experience. Although, some students may find those techniques inaccessible. The reason for this issue may be due to geographic restrictions, handicaps, or schedule difficulties.
In a hybrid schedule, blended learning offers the chance to customize learning and regain instructional time. A few of the most common models for constructing hybrid learning are presented below. Every model has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Educators must be deliberate in selecting a model that meets the requirements of our pupils.
Every student in this model attends class synchronously at the same time. On the other hand, you create differentiated activities for children at home and in class. Implementing synchronous and asynchronous communication technologies for students at home and in person works effectively. This method ensures that all pupils are present at the same time during the class. Students begin by either logging into a video conferencing technology from home or physically arriving at their seats. You can then differentiate your approach to the two modalities from there.
The second method treats each group as though it were a separate cohort within the broader class. While students may be learning the same subjects and working toward the same goals, they fundamentally function as different courses. Students choose whether to take the virtual route: synchronous remote learning. Some pick the online track like asynchronous remote learning. Or, some may choose the face-to-face way at the start of the course. You might want to run both virtual and in-person lessons at the same time as you teach.
This combined model is most suited to every situation. There aren’t many “spork moments” in it. However, it poses a significant logistical and preparation problem. As a result, dividing the cohorts can occasionally be beneficial. Here the division can be into separate classrooms and allowing various teachers to alternate instructing the virtual or in-person groups
You may have all students opting into face-to-face learning in some situations, but you must maintain social distance. Here is where the Split A/B model shines.
In this model, the subject stays the same. However, one student must volunteer to use the video chat and a single computer to allow all the other students to participate in this approach. During direct instruction, this person can sit close to the teacher.
Each of these models works excellently in some conditions while failing miserably in others.
Educators must think strategically about how to reconstruct learning methods to maximize the benefits of each model.