Labs have come a long way since Thomas Alva Edison’s improvisations with fireplace chimneys to exhaust noxious fumes in the late nineteenth century.
Edison, whose name is on 1,093 United States patents, was a pioneer in laboratory ventilation. He would most likely be thrilled to see how lab facilities have embraced energy efficiency, sustainability, flexibility, and automation over the years. And, if he were designing labs today, the prolific inventor would undoubtedly have been at the forefront of initiatives like the “paperless lab” while championing the “lab of the future.”
Just as Edison looked around the corner to see what was next for labs in his time, today’s lab designers must be acutely cognizant of emerging facility trends, as well as avoiding certain slippery slopes at all costs. Among other requirements, they must now be conversant with features like interoperability—how lab tools interact with each other—the costs, benefits, and disadvantages of integrating systems and processes, and, critically, how to design and build labs to meet current demands while ensuring that designs are ready for future needs too.
To be sure, modern labs are now more than just safe, efficient facilities with the best tools to investigate breakthrough science. They have incorporated collaborative workspaces that smooth the progress of teamwork and promote a sense of community to drive research productivity and output www.myaarpmedicare.com.
Today’s labs offer a “much better working environment” and notes that “labs in the 1980s were horrendous. The management of chemicals and hazardous materials, including explosive gases, was really sloppy, constituting a huge safety hazard.”
“There have been a lot of innovations in these areas, and labs are much safer than they used to be. Industries and universities have safety departments; they have specific safety protocols now, which are followed with greater discipline, lab space is more flexible now, and that “helps to make the environment more enlivening.” He says that work that once had to be done in messy lab environments can now be completed with automated equipment—such as digital photographic equipment, which led to the elimination of dark rooms in biomedical labs myaarpmedicare.
“Environments are now more flexible and geared toward people’s comfort. Safety can be addressed with systems we did not have in the past, such as occupancy sensors that ramp up ventilation and lighting when people are in the space and turn them down when no one is around. This creates a better, safer environment that uses less energy.
“There is a design-driven quality to this, and it is also a function of what people are asking for and what they want in their labs.”As in many other endeavours, one size does not fit all in the lab environment. In a lot of research groups, there are researchers who work best as individuals, and maybe a more social environment is not what they want.
Energy savings and efficiency, flexibility, safety (including security), and acceptability are the key drivers of laboratory design decisions today. “These are the issues that we have dealt with in every lab we have designed over the past several years,”